Abstract

We contend that the representational aspects of recovery play an important but underresearched role in shaping long-term outcomes for disaster-affected populations. Ideas constructed around events, people and processes, and conveyed through discussion, texts and images, are seldom neutral and can be exclusionary in their effect. This review draws insights from literature across multiple disciplines to examine how the representation of needs, roles and approaches to recovery influences the support different social groups receive, their capacities to recover, and their rights and agency. It shows how these representations can be contested and challenged, often by disasteraffected people themselves, and calls for increased attention on how to move creatively towards more informed, inclusive and supportive recovery visions and processes.